MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/24733938.2020.1846769

Медицинская библиотека · Science & medicine in football · 2020

Immediate effects of an acute bout of repeated soccer heading on cognitive performance.

Ashton Jake, Coyles Ginny, Malone James J, Roberts James W

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Purpose: There isgrowing concern surrounding the harmful effects of soccer heading on cognitive function. The present study aims to examine the immediate effects of heading.

Methods

30 recreational male soccer players were divided into three groups that undertook 20 consecutive headers with a soft (8.8 psi), hard (16.2 psi), or no (control) ball. A battery of neuropsychological tests was completed before and after heading: King-Devick, trail-making (TM) (A, B), digit span (DS) and spatial span (SS) (forward, backward).

Results

Significant increase in the time (M = 4.44 s) and errors (M = 1.45) for the King-Devick test within the hard and soft groups, although there was no significant difference for TM-A and TM-B. Significant decline for SS forward within the hard and soft groups (M= -16%), although the declines for SS backward (M = -16%), DS forward (M= -23%) and DS backward (M = -25%) were present only for the hard group (ps <.05).Discussion: While outside of regular match-play, this study showed that heading negatively influenced one indicator of a suspected concussion (King-Devick), as well as working memory (DS, SS) that is essential for daily life. These findings contribute to the growing debate surrounding heading safety.

Для цитирования: Ashton Jake, Coyles Ginny, Malone James J, Roberts James W. Immediate effects of an acute bout of repeated soccer heading on cognitive performance.. Science & medicine in football. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2020.1846769.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.