MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/micr.20534

Медицинская библиотека · Microsurgery · 2008

Simple and reliable way in sternum wound coverage--tripedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap.

Chou Erh-Kang, Tai Yu-Tzu, Chen Hung-Chi, Chen Kuang-Te

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Sternotomy wound infection requires radically debridements and need secondary reconstruction of the resulting defect. Pectoralis major muscular or musculocutaneous flap is quite common in sternal wound closure. We modified the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap design: bipedicle advancement cutaneous flap combined with thoracoacromial myocutaneous perforators, as a "tripedicle" fashion. We tried to utilize the cutaneous pedicle to provide a reliable skin coverage and decrease the wound dehiscence rate in lower one third sternal wound.

METHODS

Four patients undergoing median sternotomy surgery between 2004 and 2007 suffered from sternal wound infection and received tri-pedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flaps transfer.

RESULTS

No skin paddle necrosis or wound dehiscence occurred in the postoperative course. Cosmetically and chest stability were satisfactory without complains about the daily activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tripedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap is a simple and reliable technique to cover sternal wound defect necessitating resurfacing surgery. The blood supply to the skin paddle can be enriched by the superior and inferior cutaneous pedicle and the wound dehiscence rate is decreased with this technique.

Для цитирования: Chou Erh-Kang, Tai Yu-Tzu, Chen Hung-Chi, Chen Kuang-Te. Simple and reliable way in sternum wound coverage--tripedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap.. Microsurgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20534.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.