MedElevator
Войти в исследования Histopathology · 2025
Practical implementation of AI in a non-academic, non-commercial Pathology laboratory: Real world experience and lessons learned.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deman Frederik, Broeckx Glenn, Declercq Sabine, Degotte Quentin, Raymaekers Jakob, Salgado Roberto, Dendooven Amélie
Аннотация
AIMS: As pathology departments transition towards digital workflows, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) is anticipated to become increasingly common. This study aimed to describe the real-world implementation and impact of AI integration in routine pathological diagnostics, specifically focusing on prostate biopsy evaluations at the Department of Pathology, ZAS Hospitals, Antwerp.
METHODS AND RESULTS: An AI tool for analysing prostate biopsies was integrated into the department's daily workflow by embedding it into existing laboratory information and reporting systems. Following a short adaptation period, the use of AI led to measurable improvements. Most notably, there was a reduction in the number of immunohistochemical tests required, indicating more confident primary diagnoses. Additionally, a significant decrease in turnaround times for biopsy evaluations was observed, highlighting improved efficiency. The implementation process was closely monitored, and practical insights were gathered to guide future AI deployments in pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: The first-year experience of integrating AI into daily pathological practice demonstrated tangible benefits in diagnostic efficiency and workflow optimization. However, the process also revealed several challenges related to real-world deployment, including adaptation by staff and system integration hurdles. The lessons learned provide valuable guidance for other institutions considering similar AI implementations, reinforcing the importance of strategic planning, training and system compatibility in successful adoption.
METHODS AND RESULTS: An AI tool for analysing prostate biopsies was integrated into the department's daily workflow by embedding it into existing laboratory information and reporting systems. Following a short adaptation period, the use of AI led to measurable improvements. Most notably, there was a reduction in the number of immunohistochemical tests required, indicating more confident primary diagnoses. Additionally, a significant decrease in turnaround times for biopsy evaluations was observed, highlighting improved efficiency. The implementation process was closely monitored, and practical insights were gathered to guide future AI deployments in pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: The first-year experience of integrating AI into daily pathological practice demonstrated tangible benefits in diagnostic efficiency and workflow optimization. However, the process also revealed several challenges related to real-world deployment, including adaptation by staff and system integration hurdles. The lessons learned provide valuable guidance for other institutions considering similar AI implementations, reinforcing the importance of strategic planning, training and system compatibility in successful adoption.