MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.023

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2008

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer.

Eberl Thomas, Jagoditsch Michael, Klingler Anton, Tschmelitsch Jörg

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists concerning the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on anastomotic dehiscence after resection for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1986 and July 2006, 472 patients underwent curative rectal resection. Patient and tumor characteristics, details of treatment, and postoperative results were recorded prospectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

In our patients, the anastomotic leak rate was 10.4% (49 of 472 patients), and mortality was 2.2% (1 of 49 patients). In univariate analysis, tumor diameter and absence of a protective stoma were associated with increased anastomotic leak rate, whereas American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and tumor localization showed borderline significance. In multivariate analysis, tumor diameter, tumor localization, and absence of a protective stoma were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with large and low lying rectal tumors are at high risk for anastomotic leakage. A protective stoma significantly decreases the rate of clinical leaks and subsequent reoperation after low anterior resection.

Для цитирования: Eberl Thomas, Jagoditsch Michael, Klingler Anton, Tschmelitsch Jörg. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer.. American journal of surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.