MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmj.i582

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016

Height, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank.

Tyrrell Jessica, Jones Samuel E, Beaumont Robin, Astley Christina M, Lovell Rebecca, Yaghootkar Hanieh, Tuke Marcus, Ruth Katherine S, Freathy Rachel M, Hirschhorn Joel N, Wood Andrew R, Murray Anna, Weedon Michael N, Frayling Timothy M

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether height and body mass index (BMI) have a causal role in five measures of socioeconomic status.

DESIGN

Mendelian randomisation study to test for causal effects of differences in stature and BMI on five measures of socioeconomic status. Mendelian randomisation exploits the fact that genotypes are randomly assigned at conception and thus not confounded by non-genetic factors.

SETTING

UK Biobank.

PARTICIPANTS

119,669 men and women of British ancestry, aged between 37 and 73 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age completed full time education, degree level education, job class, annual household income, and Townsend deprivation index.

RESULTS

In the UK Biobank study, shorter stature and higher BMI were observationally associated with several measures of lower socioeconomic status. The associations between shorter stature and lower socioeconomic status tended to be stronger in men, and the associations between higher BMI and lower socioeconomic status tended to be stronger in women. For example, a 1 standard deviation (SD) higher BMI was associated with a £210 (€276; $300; 95% confidence interval £84 to £420; P=6 × 10(-3)) lower annual household income in men and a £1890 (£1680 to £2100; P=6 × 10(-15)) lower annual household income in women. Genetic analysis provided evidence that these associations were partly causal. A genetically determined 1 SD (6.3 cm) taller stature caused a 0.06 (0.02 to 0.09) year older age of completing full time education (P=0.01), a 1.12 (1.07 to 1.18) times higher odds of working in a skilled profession (P=6 × 10(-7)), and a £1130 (£680 to £1580) higher annual household income (P=4 × 10(-8)). Associations were stronger in men. A genetically determined 1 SD higher BMI (4.6 kg/m(2)) caused a £2940 (£1680 to £4200; P=1 × 10(-5)) lower annual household income and a 0.10 (0.04 to 0.16) SD (P=0.001) higher level of deprivation in women only.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support evidence that height and BMI play an important partial role in determining several aspects of a person's socioeconomic status, especially women's BMI for income and deprivation and men's height for education, income, and job class. These findings have important social and health implications, supporting evidence that overweight people, especially women, are at a disadvantage and that taller people, especially men, are at an advantage.

Для цитирования: Tyrrell Jessica, Jones Samuel E, Beaumont Robin, Astley Christina M, Lovell Rebecca, Yaghootkar Hanieh, Tuke Marcus, Ruth Katherine S, Freathy Rachel M, Hirschhorn Joel N, Wood Andrew R, Murray Anna, Weedon Michael N, Frayling Timothy M. Height, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i582.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.