MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.07.016

Медицинская библиотека · Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2011

Restrictive cardiomyopathy as a cardiac manifestation of myofibrillar myopathy.

Finsterer Josef, Stöllberger Claudia, Höftberger Romana

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) has been repeatedly reported as a cardiac manifestation of certain neuromuscular disorders, but only in single patients with myofibrillar myopathy (MFMP).

CASE REPORT: In a 19-year-old woman with a history of short stature, tiptoe-walking since childhood, fixed joint contractures, severe scoliosis requiring surgical correction, elevated levels of creatine kinase, and RCM, MFMP was diagnosed based on her clinical presentation, her elevated muscle enzymes and a muscle biopsy. An electrocardiogram showed an atrioventricular-block I, paroxysmal sinus-tachycardia, biphasic P-waves, right-axis deviation, abnormal repolarization, and episodes of supraventricular tachycardia. Echocardiography confirmed her RCM. Her respiratory function was markedly reduced, despite surgical correction of her severe scoliosis at age 14 years. After an aggravation of heart failure because of atrial flutter, the patient profited from successful cardioversion and diuretics.

CONCLUSION

Electrocardiographic abnormalities such as atrial flutter and RCM represent cardiac manifestations of MFMP. Cardioversion can be successful, and oral anticoagulation may prevent cardioembolic events.

Для цитирования: Finsterer Josef, Stöllberger Claudia, Höftberger Romana. Restrictive cardiomyopathy as a cardiac manifestation of myofibrillar myopathy.. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.07.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.