Sleep medicine · 2021
Electrophysiological findings in patients with restless legs syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdulhadi Israa Ghazi, Al-Mahdawi Akram Mohammed, Hamdan Farqad Bader
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) manifests as an urge to move the body to relieve the discomfortable sensations, primarily when resting, sitting, laying down, or sleeping. Diagnosis of RLS relies on clinical criteria, and the immobilization test was the only instrumental tool with equivocal results.
OBJECTIVES: To assess different electrophysiological findings in patients with RLS, and compare the diagnostic values of these parameters in the diagnosis of RLS.
METHODS: 30 patients with primary RLS and 30 controls who were matched for age and gender were studied. Participant's demographics, laboratory findings, and electrophysiological test, namely nerve conduction studies (NCS), cutaneous silent period (CSP), H reflex and sympathetic skin response (SSR), F-wave latency, amplitude, F-wave duration (FWD), and the ratio between FWD and duration of the corresponding compound muscle action potential (FWD/CMAPD) were analyzed.
RESULTS: None of the patients showed altered NCS data. FWD of upper (12.37 ± 2.77 ms) and lower limb (21.71 ± 5.24 ms) were significantly longer in patients. Also, FWD/CMAP duration of the upper (1.03 ± 0.2) and lower limb (2.02 ± 0.55) was longer in patients. Likewise, they exhibited delayed CSP latency from TA (110.62 ± 13.73 ms) and APB (77.35 ± 12.16 ms) whereas the CSP duration from TA and APB was decreased (37.36 ± 11.59 ms; 42.55 ± 7.97 ms, respectively). The SSR latency was not different, and right-sided H reflex amplitude (5.07 ± 3.98 mV) and H/M ratio (0.65 ± 1.81) were significantly increased in the patient group.
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that there may be a dysfunction of the inhibitory/excitatory circuits at a spinal level; and no pathology in the peripheral nerves. The unilateral difference of H reflex amplitude and H/M ratio may suggest asymmetrical central inhibitory dysfunction. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are now needed to evaluate the pathophysiology of RLS with different neurophysiological assessment tools.
OBJECTIVES: To assess different electrophysiological findings in patients with RLS, and compare the diagnostic values of these parameters in the diagnosis of RLS.
METHODS: 30 patients with primary RLS and 30 controls who were matched for age and gender were studied. Participant's demographics, laboratory findings, and electrophysiological test, namely nerve conduction studies (NCS), cutaneous silent period (CSP), H reflex and sympathetic skin response (SSR), F-wave latency, amplitude, F-wave duration (FWD), and the ratio between FWD and duration of the corresponding compound muscle action potential (FWD/CMAPD) were analyzed.
RESULTS: None of the patients showed altered NCS data. FWD of upper (12.37 ± 2.77 ms) and lower limb (21.71 ± 5.24 ms) were significantly longer in patients. Also, FWD/CMAP duration of the upper (1.03 ± 0.2) and lower limb (2.02 ± 0.55) was longer in patients. Likewise, they exhibited delayed CSP latency from TA (110.62 ± 13.73 ms) and APB (77.35 ± 12.16 ms) whereas the CSP duration from TA and APB was decreased (37.36 ± 11.59 ms; 42.55 ± 7.97 ms, respectively). The SSR latency was not different, and right-sided H reflex amplitude (5.07 ± 3.98 mV) and H/M ratio (0.65 ± 1.81) were significantly increased in the patient group.
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that there may be a dysfunction of the inhibitory/excitatory circuits at a spinal level; and no pathology in the peripheral nerves. The unilateral difference of H reflex amplitude and H/M ratio may suggest asymmetrical central inhibitory dysfunction. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are now needed to evaluate the pathophysiology of RLS with different neurophysiological assessment tools.