Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale · 2015
Prevalence of Liver Disease and Utilization of a Hepatology Consultation Service at an Urban Tertiary Care Hospital.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wong Stephen G, Pollock Richard, Minuk Gerald Y
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The prevalence of liver disease and frequency of consultations to a Hepatology Consultation service for patients with liver enzyme/function abnormalities admitted to a clinical teaching unit at an urban tertiary care hospital have not been previously described. To document these data, a retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted for non-hepatobiliary problems to a general Internal Medicine clinical teaching unit at an urban, tertiary care hospital during a three month period was performed.
METHODS: Laboratory test results were reviewed to determine if liver enzymes and function tests had been ordered during the first five days of admission and, in those with abnormal results, whether referrals had been sent to the hospital's Hepatology Consultation service for further investigations and/or management.
RESULTS: A total of 506 admissions occurred during the study period. Of these, 452 (89%) were for patients with no known liver disease. Liver biochemistry testing was obtained in 218 (48.2%) of these individuals. In 192 (88.1%), liver enzyme or function tests were abnormal and in 91 (41.7%), both enzymes and function tests were abnormal (suggesting more advanced disease). Referrals to the Hepatology Consultation service were requested for 5/91 (5.5%) patients with more advanced disease and none with only liver enzyme or function tests abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Although liver enzymes and/or function test abnormalities are common in this patient population, screening for liver disease is relatively uncommon and consultation to a Hepatology Consultation service occurs in less than 10% of cases.
METHODS: Laboratory test results were reviewed to determine if liver enzymes and function tests had been ordered during the first five days of admission and, in those with abnormal results, whether referrals had been sent to the hospital's Hepatology Consultation service for further investigations and/or management.
RESULTS: A total of 506 admissions occurred during the study period. Of these, 452 (89%) were for patients with no known liver disease. Liver biochemistry testing was obtained in 218 (48.2%) of these individuals. In 192 (88.1%), liver enzyme or function tests were abnormal and in 91 (41.7%), both enzymes and function tests were abnormal (suggesting more advanced disease). Referrals to the Hepatology Consultation service were requested for 5/91 (5.5%) patients with more advanced disease and none with only liver enzyme or function tests abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Although liver enzymes and/or function test abnormalities are common in this patient population, screening for liver disease is relatively uncommon and consultation to a Hepatology Consultation service occurs in less than 10% of cases.