MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1378/chest.100.2.416

Медицинская библиотека · Chest · 1991

Response of obstructive sleep apnea to fluoxetine and protriptyline.

Hanzel D A, Proia N G, Hudgel D W

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Protripyline is the pharmacologic agent most commonly used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, its anticholinergic side effects make it intolerable to many patients. Because serotonin may be a central respiratory stimulant and because the serotonin-uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, is usually well tolerated, we wanted to try fluoxetine in the treatment of OSA. Therefore, we compared the effect of fluoxetine to that of protriptyline in 12 patients with OSA. Both drugs significantly decreased the proportion of REM sleep time and decreased the number of apneas or hypopneas in NREM sleep. The response to fluoxetine was equivalent to that of protriptyline; however, for the group as a whole, there was no significant improvement in the number of arterial oxygen desaturation events, the level of arterial oxygen desaturation, or the number of arousals with either agent. Although there was wide variability in the response to each medication, six of the 12 patients had good responses, including improvement in oxygenation, to either fluoxetine or protriptyline. Three patients could not complete the trial of protriptyline. We conclude that fluoxetine is beneficial to some, but not all, patients with OSA. Fluoxetine was better tolerated than protriptyline.

Для цитирования: Hanzel D A, Proia N G, Hudgel D W. Response of obstructive sleep apnea to fluoxetine and protriptyline.. Chest. 1991. DOI: 10.1378/chest.100.2.416.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.