MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2018

A medicolegal analysis of malpractice claims involving anesthesiologists in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite (2007-2016).

Stone Alexander B, Brovman Ethan Y, Greenberg Penny, Urman Richard D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal endoscopy cases make up the largest portion of out of operating room malpractice claims involving anesthesiologists. To date, there has been no closed claims analysis specifically focusing on the claims from the endoscopy suite. We aim to identify associated case characteristics and contributing factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of closed claims.

SETTING

Multi-institutional setting of hospitals that submit data to the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Comparative Benchmarking System, a database representing approximately 30% of annual malpractice cases in the United States.

PATIENTS: A total of 58 claims in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures.

MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed associated factors for each case as well as payments, and severity scores.

MAIN

RESULTS

There was a difference in the percent of cases that resulted in payment by procedure type, with 91% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cases resulting in payment compared with 37.5% of colonoscopy cases, 25% of combined esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/colonoscopy cases, 21.4% of EGD cases and 0.0% of endoscopic ultrasound cases (P = 0.0008). Oversedation was a possible contributing factor in 62.5% of cases. The mean payment for all claims involving anesthesiologists in the endoscopy suite was $99,754.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in the rates of payment of malpractice claims between procedures. ERCPs made up a disproportionate percentage of the total amount paid to patients. While a significant percent of cases involved possible oversedation, these errors were compounded by other factors, such as failure to resuscitate or recognize the acute clinical change. With medically complex patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, it is critical to have well prepared anesthesia providers.

Для цитирования: Stone Alexander B, Brovman Ethan Y, Greenberg Penny, Urman Richard D. A medicolegal analysis of malpractice claims involving anesthesiologists in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite (2007-2016).. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.