MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-025-11532-8

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2025

Safety of laparoscopic compared to open right hepatectomy after portal vein occlusion: results from a multicenter study.

Langella Serena, Russolillo Nadia, Sijberden Jasper, Fiorentini Guido, Guglielmo Nicola, Primrose John, Modi Sachin, Massella Virginia, Ettorre Giuseppe Maria, Aldrighetti Luca, Hilal Mohamed Abu, Ferrero Alessandro

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been expressed about the feasibility of laparoscopic right hepatectomy (Lap-RH) after portal vein occlusion (PVO), because of its technical difficulty. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of lap-RH after PVO.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from high-volume HPB centers was performed. The peri-operative outcomes of lap-RH were compared to open-RH. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate the influence of selection bias. Both one-stage and two-stage procedures were considered.

RESULTS

Between 01/2010 and 12/2020, 284 patients underwent RH or extended RH after PVO. The laparoscopic approach was used in 63 (22%) cases. Overall, surgeries were mainly performed for colorectal metastases (68.6%). Two-stage procedures were required in one-third of the cases for both groups. After PSM, 126 patients of the open-RH group were matched with 63 patients of the lap-RH group. In the lap-RH group, compared to open-RH, median FLR% post-PVO was larger (39.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.037), median operation time was longer (360 vs 264 min, p < 0.001), pedicle clamping was used more frequently (79.4% vs 38.9%, p > 0.001), and median blood loss was higher (250 cc vs 200 cc, p = 0.024). Severe intraoperative incidents seldom occurred in both groups (6.3% lap-RH vs 1.6% open-RH, p = 0.208). The overall and severe complication rates were comparable. ISGLS liver failure grade B/C was rare in both groups (3.2% lap-RH vs 4.8% open-RH, p = 0.721). 90-day mortality was 1.6% following either lap-RH or open-RH. Lap-RH allowed a shorter median hospital stay (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.001). R1 resection rate was lower after lap-RH (3.2% vs 16%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Lap-RH after PVO is safe, although it is technically more demanding than open-RH. This study also suggests some potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach, in terms of a shorter hospital stay and increased rate of radical resections.

Для цитирования: Langella Serena, Russolillo Nadia, Sijberden Jasper, Fiorentini Guido, Guglielmo Nicola, Primrose John, Modi Sachin, Massella Virginia, Ettorre Giuseppe Maria, Aldrighetti Luca, Hilal Mohamed Abu, Ferrero Alessandro. Safety of laparoscopic compared to open right hepatectomy after portal vein occlusion: results from a multicenter study.. Surgical endoscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11532-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.