MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.008

Медицинская библиотека · European urology · 2020

Learning Curve in Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Results from the European Robotic Urological Society Working Group.

Gallioli Andrea, Territo Angelo, Boissier Romain, Campi Riccardo, Vignolini Graziano, Musquera Mireia, Alcaraz Antonio, Decaestecker Karel, Tugcu Volkan, Vanacore Davide, Serni Sergio, Breda Alberto

СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recently, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) was recently introduced as renal replacement mini-invasive surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To report surgical technique, including tips and tricks, and the learning curve for RAKT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive RAKTs performed in the five highest-volume centers of the European Robotic Urological Society RAKT group were reviewed, and a step-by-step description of the technique was compiled.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Surgeries were performed with Da Vinci Si/Xi. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position. The Trendelenburg position was set at 20-30° and the robot was docked between the legs.

MEASUREMENTS: Shewhart control charts and cumulative summation (CUSUM) graphs and trifecta were generated to assess the learning curve according to rewarming time (RWT), intra/postoperative complications, and renal graft function (glomerular filtration rate) on days 7 and 30, and at 1 yr. Linear regressions were performed to compare the learning curves of each surgeon.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Arterial anastomosis time was below the alarm/alert line in 93.3%/88.9% of RAKTs, while venous anastomosis time was below the alarm/alert line in 88.9%/73.9%. The nonanastomotic RWT exceeded +3 standard deviation (SD) in 24.7% of procedures and +2SD in 37.1%. In only 46% cases, the RWT was below the alert line. The ureteroneocystostomy time was below +2SD and +3SD in 87.9% and 90.2% of cases, respectively. CUSUM showed that the learning curve for arterial anastomosis required up to 35 (mean = 16) cases. Complications and delayed graft function rates decreased significantly and reached a plateau after the first 20 cases. Trifecta was achieved in 75% (24/32) of the cases after the first 34 RAKTs in each center.

CONCLUSIONS

A minimum of 35 cases are necessary to reach reproducibility in terms of RWT, complications, and functional results.

PATIENT SUMMARY: Robot-assisted kidney transplantation requires a learning curve of 35 cases to achieve reproducibility in terms of timing, complications, and functional results. Synergy between the surgeon and the assistant is crucial to reduce rewarming time. High-grade complications and delayed graft function are rare after ten surgeries. Hands-on training and proctorship are highly recommended.

Для цитирования: Gallioli Andrea, Territo Angelo, Boissier Romain, Campi Riccardo, Vignolini Graziano, Musquera Mireia, Alcaraz Antonio, Decaestecker Karel, Tugcu Volkan, Vanacore Davide, Serni Sergio, Breda Alberto. Learning Curve in Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Results from the European Robotic Urological Society Working Group.. European urology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.