MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7774/cevr.2016.5.1.26

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2016

Comparison of the antigenic relationship between Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes 1 and 3.

Kang Bo-Kyu, Hwang Jeong-Min, Moon Hyoungjoon, Han Sang-Yoon, Kim Jong-Man, Yang Dong-Kun, Park Bong-Kyun, Song Daesub

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) genotype circulating in Korea has changed from G3 to G1. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the antigenic relationship between the two genotypes by using antibody tests.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Blood samples from 42 sows and 216 horses were collected, and their seroprevalence was monitored using the hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization tests. Antisera against JEV G1 and G3 were isolated and prepared from guinea pigs. The cross-reactivity of these two viruses was then compared using the neutralizing antibody test.

RESULTS

We found that there was a difference in the seropositive ratios of JEV G1 and G3. However, the difference was dependent on the antibody test used. There was also an observed difference in the antigenicity between the two genotypes, as ascertained using the neutralizing antibody test.

CONCLUSION

There is an evident difference in JEV antigenicity between the genotypes G1 and G3. Therefore, we propose monitoring of the seroprevalence of JEV, and reevaluating the antigenicity of the current vaccine by using the relevant tests.

Для цитирования: Kang Bo-Kyu, Hwang Jeong-Min, Moon Hyoungjoon, Han Sang-Yoon, Kim Jong-Man, Yang Dong-Kun, Park Bong-Kyun, Song Daesub. Comparison of the antigenic relationship between Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes 1 and 3.. Clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2016. DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2016.5.1.26.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.