Academic radiology · 2025
Impact of AI-Generated ADC Maps on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ozyoruk Kutsev B, Harmon Stephanie A, Yilmaz Enis C, Gelikman David G, Bagci Ulas, Simon Benjamin D, Merino Maria J, Lis Rosina, Gurram Sandeep, Wood Bradford J, Pinto Peter A, Choyke Peter L, Turkbey Baris
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of AI-generated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps on diagnostic performance of a 3D U-Net AI model for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and segmentation at biparametric MRI (bpMRI).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population was retrospectively collected and consisted of 178 patients, including 119 cases and 59 controls. Cases had a mean age of 62.1 years (SD=7.4) and a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 7.27ng/mL (IQR=5.43-10.55), while controls had a mean age of 63.4 years (SD=7.5) and a median PSA of 6.66ng/mL (IQR=4.29-11.30). All participants underwent 3.0 T T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MRI and high b-value echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (bpMRI), followed by either prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2022. We compared the lesion detection and segmentation performance of a pretrained 3D U-Net AI model using conventional ADC maps versus AI-generated ADC maps. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated via bootstrapping. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: AI-ADC maps increased the accuracy of the lesion detection AI model, from 0.70 to 0.78 (p<0.01). Specificity increased from 0.22 to 0.47 (p<0.001), while maintaining high sensitivity, which was 0.94 with conventional ADC maps and 0.93 with AI-ADC maps (p>0.05). Mean dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for conventional ADC maps was 0.276, while AI-ADC maps showed a mean DSC of 0.225 (p<0.05). In the subset of patients with ISUP≥2, standard ADC maps demonstrated a mean DSC of 0.282 compared to 0.230 for AI-ADC maps (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: AI-generated ADC maps can improve performance of computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population was retrospectively collected and consisted of 178 patients, including 119 cases and 59 controls. Cases had a mean age of 62.1 years (SD=7.4) and a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 7.27ng/mL (IQR=5.43-10.55), while controls had a mean age of 63.4 years (SD=7.5) and a median PSA of 6.66ng/mL (IQR=4.29-11.30). All participants underwent 3.0 T T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MRI and high b-value echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (bpMRI), followed by either prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2022. We compared the lesion detection and segmentation performance of a pretrained 3D U-Net AI model using conventional ADC maps versus AI-generated ADC maps. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated via bootstrapping. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: AI-ADC maps increased the accuracy of the lesion detection AI model, from 0.70 to 0.78 (p<0.01). Specificity increased from 0.22 to 0.47 (p<0.001), while maintaining high sensitivity, which was 0.94 with conventional ADC maps and 0.93 with AI-ADC maps (p>0.05). Mean dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for conventional ADC maps was 0.276, while AI-ADC maps showed a mean DSC of 0.225 (p<0.05). In the subset of patients with ISUP≥2, standard ADC maps demonstrated a mean DSC of 0.282 compared to 0.230 for AI-ADC maps (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: AI-generated ADC maps can improve performance of computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer.