The British journal of family planning · 1999
Barriers to the use of IUDs as emergency contraception.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reuter S
Аннотация
The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a very effective form of emergency contraception (EC). This author hypothesised that IUDs are an underused method and determined to evaluate potential barriers to IUD use. A postal survey of 100 family planning doctors and 100 general practitioners was conducted in Trent Region during March 1998 with a 70 per cent response rate. Lack of time was the most important factor that influenced doctor's decisions not to offer IUDs to the majority of women requesting emergency contraception. Most doctors registered concern about the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Misconceptions and a lack of accurate information contributed to participants reluctance to discuss IUDs as emergency contraception. Lack of time in consultations is a well-recognised issue in general practice. The risk of sexually transmitted infections is a nationwide concern, but is difficult to address without accurate data on the prevalence of the most common pathogens. Considerable effort would be required to increase doctors' knowledge and willingness to offer IUDs routinely to women requesting emergency contraception.