MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivaa002

Медицинская библиотека · Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2020

Does routine fenestration improve early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing Fontan palliation?

Toncu Alexandra, Rădulescu Cristina Ramona, Dorobanţu Dan, Stoica Șerban

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'In [patients undergoing Fontan palliation] does [fenestration] affect [early and late postoperative outcomes]?' Altogether 509 papers were found using the reported search, of which 11 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Current data suggest that the use of fenestration has advantages in the immediate postoperative course, with fewer complications such as pleural effusions, shorter hospitalization and decreased early Fontan failure, but comparable long-term outcomes to a non-fenestrated approach. Fenestration should be used in high-risk patients or based on the haemodynamic parameters measured before weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Routine use may potentially lead to additional late fenestration closure procedures in some patients, without improving long-term outcomes.

Для цитирования: Toncu Alexandra, Rădulescu Cristina Ramona, Dorobanţu Dan, Stoica Șerban. Does routine fenestration improve early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing Fontan palliation?. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.