MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/njcp.njcp_12_17

Медицинская библиотека · Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2018

Dentists knowledge of lipid treatment of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.

Oksuz G, Urfalioglu A, Sekmen T, Akkececi N, Alpay N, Bilal B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONTEXT: : Local anesthetics (LAs) are in widespread use by dental practitioners, and erroneous administration, such as intravenously or exceeding the maximum dose, can cause the life-threatening condition of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST).

AIMS: The objective of the present study was evaluate the ability of dentists to recognize signs of LAST and quantify how often they have used lipids to treat LAST in dentistry patients.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study administered 600 questionnaires that asked about the frequency with which dentists encountered LAST and the symptoms of LAST and its treatment, especially with lipids.

RESULTS

The results showed that 520 (86.66%) respondents had never seen LAST, and 404 (67.3%) had no idea about lipid treatment. In addition, 128 (21.3%) had heard about lipid treatment but had inadequate knowledge of it and 59 (9.8%) had read an article about lipid treatment, but only 9 (1.5%) knew how to use lipid treatment. Finally, 80 (13.33%) participants had seen LAST but had used a treatment other than lipids.

CONCLUSION

Dentists and all facilities using LA must be aware of LAST, and knowledge of lipid treatment must be increased by education. Twenty percent lipid solutions must be kept handy in their offices by dentists.

Для цитирования: Oksuz G, Urfalioglu A, Sekmen T, Akkececi N, Alpay N, Bilal B. Dentists knowledge of lipid treatment of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity.. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2018. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_12_17.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.