MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000348949210100501

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 1992

Inspiratory speech as a management option for spastic dysphonia. Case study.

Harrison G A, Davis P J, Troughear R H, Winkworth A L

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A case study is reported of a subject who has used inspiratory speech (IS) for 6 years as a means of overcoming the communication problems of long-standing adductor spastic dysphonia (ASD). The subject was studied to confirm his use of IS, determine the mechanisms of its production, investigate its effects on ventilatory gas exchange, and confirm that it was perceptually preferable to ASD expiratory speech (ES). Results showed that the production and control of a high laryngeal resistance to airflow were necessary for usable IS. Voice quality was quantitatively and perceptually poor; however, the improved fluency and absence of phonatory spasm made IS the preferred speaking mode for both the listener and the speaker. Transcutaneous measurements of the partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the subject's blood were made during extended speaking periods. These measurements indicated that ventilation was unchanged during IS, and that ventilation during ES was similar to the "hyperventilation" state of normal speakers. The reasons for the absence of phonatory spasm during IS are discussed, and the possibility of its use as a noninvasive management option for other ASD sufferers is addressed.

Для цитирования: Harrison G A, Davis P J, Troughear R H, Winkworth A L. Inspiratory speech as a management option for spastic dysphonia. Case study.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1992. DOI: 10.1177/000348949210100501.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.