DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04702
Quantification of tremor severity with a mobile tremor pen.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
An objective evaluation of tremor severity is necessary to document the course of disease, the efficacy of treatment, or interventions in clinical trials. Most available objective quantification devices are complex, immobile, or not validated.
NEW METHOD: We used the TREMITAS-System that comprises a pen-shaped sensor for tremor quantification. The Power of Main Peak and the Total Power were used as surrogate markers for tremor amplitude. Tremor severity was assessed by the TREMITAS-System and relevant subscores of the MDS-UPDRS and TETRAS rating scales in 14 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 16 patients with Essential tremor (ET) off and on therapy. We compared tremor amplitudes assessed during wearable and hand-held constellations.
RESULTS
We found significant correlations between tremor amplitudes captured by TREM and tremor severity assessed by the MDS-UPDRS in PD (r = 0.638-0.779) and the TETRAS in ET (r = 0.597-0. 704) off and on therapy. The TREMITAS-System captured the L-Dopa-induced improvement of tremor in PD patients (p = 0.027). Tremor amplitudes did not differ between the handheld and wearable constellation (p > 0.05).
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS
We confirm the results of previous studies using inertial based sensors that tremor severity and drug-induced changes of tremor severity can be quantified using inertial based sensors. The assessment of tremor amplitudes was not influenced by using a handheld or wearable constellation.
CONCLUSIONS
The TREMITAS-System can be used to quantify rest tremor in PD and postural tremor in ET and is capable of detecting clinically relevant changes in tremor in clinical and research settings.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.