MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100156

Медицинская библиотека · Interventional pain medicine · 2022

Cervical spinal cord stimulator trial complicated by epidural abscess.

Al-Jumah R, Gill J, Simopoulos T

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

BACK GROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a growing interventional treatment modality in patients experiencing intractable pain refractory to conservative treatments. Many patients with chronic low back and leg pain that persists after surgery have found pain relief, and more evidence is suggesting that chronic upper limb and neck pain may respond just as well to this therapy. However, the placement of foreign body, for instance SCS leads, in the epidural space can become the source for deep intra-spinal infection.

CASE REPORT: We present a 49-year-old robust male who underwent a temporary cervical SCS trial and was diagnosed with epidural abscess on the day 9 when the leads were pulled. The trial phase was complicated by immediate and prolonged post procedure pain. The diagnosis of epidural abscess was made soon after clinical presentation with no neurological deficits or escalation in pain but new onset fever. He made a complete recovery after extensive laminectomy and antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The decision to extend the SCS trial length poses a question of risk versus benefit in regards to potential infectious complications versus pain relief. Continuing antibiotic therapy during a SCS trial phase is a possible strategy but of uncertain benefit.

CATEGORIES: Anesthesiology, Pain Management.

Для цитирования: Al-Jumah R, Gill J, Simopoulos T. Cervical spinal cord stimulator trial complicated by epidural abscess.. Interventional pain medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100156.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.