Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2020
ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Xiaofei, Fan Xiaohan, Li Hui, Ning Xiaohui, Liang Erpeng, Ma Wentao, Wang Hao, Liu Zhimin, Yao Yan
Аннотация
AIM: To assess the electrocardiogram patterns of paced QRS narrowing after successful left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and echocardiographic measurements in patients with bradycardia and bundle branch block (BBB).
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive bradycardia patients with BBB and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% who had attempted LBBAP. Successful LBBAP was defined as paced QRS morphology of a right BBB (RBBB) pattern in lead V1 and a recording of abruptly shortened and then constant stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time with high and low output. Pacing characteristics and echocardiographic measurements were evaluated perioperatively and at 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The success rate of LBBAP was 83.6% in patients with BBB, and median cumulative X-ray dose-area product was 100.5 µGym2 (60.0, 179.3). LBBAP was successful in 19 of 26 patients with left BBB (LBBB) (73.1%) and in 27 of 29 patients with RBBB (93.1%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened in patients with LBBB (QRSd 169.4 ± 22.6 to 119.6 ± 9.5 ms), and five forms of QRSd narrowing were observed in patients with RBBB with the mean QRSd shortened from 143.1 ± 16.6 ms to 119.5 ± 11.7 ms. The thresholds for narrowing of QRSd were higher in RBBB than LBBB (1.74 ± 0.36 V/0.4 ms vs 0.79 ± 0.17 V/0.4 ms, P < .001). During the 6-month follow-up, both left and right ventricular synchronies were improved, and narrow QRSd persisted in patients with BBB.
CONCLUSION: In most bradycardia patients, RBBB could be completely or partially narrowed by LBBAP at different pacing models in addition to the correction of LBBB with LBBAP.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive bradycardia patients with BBB and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% who had attempted LBBAP. Successful LBBAP was defined as paced QRS morphology of a right BBB (RBBB) pattern in lead V1 and a recording of abruptly shortened and then constant stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time with high and low output. Pacing characteristics and echocardiographic measurements were evaluated perioperatively and at 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The success rate of LBBAP was 83.6% in patients with BBB, and median cumulative X-ray dose-area product was 100.5 µGym2 (60.0, 179.3). LBBAP was successful in 19 of 26 patients with left BBB (LBBB) (73.1%) and in 27 of 29 patients with RBBB (93.1%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened in patients with LBBB (QRSd 169.4 ± 22.6 to 119.6 ± 9.5 ms), and five forms of QRSd narrowing were observed in patients with RBBB with the mean QRSd shortened from 143.1 ± 16.6 ms to 119.5 ± 11.7 ms. The thresholds for narrowing of QRSd were higher in RBBB than LBBB (1.74 ± 0.36 V/0.4 ms vs 0.79 ± 0.17 V/0.4 ms, P < .001). During the 6-month follow-up, both left and right ventricular synchronies were improved, and narrow QRSd persisted in patients with BBB.
CONCLUSION: In most bradycardia patients, RBBB could be completely or partially narrowed by LBBAP at different pacing models in addition to the correction of LBBB with LBBAP.