MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.retram.2020.04.004

Медицинская библиотека · Current research in translational medicine · 2020

Cell therapy for prenatal repair of myelomeningocele: A systematic review.

Dugas A, Larghero J, Zérah M, Jouannic J M, Guilbaud L

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a spinal cord congenital defect that leads to paraplegia, bladder incontinence and bowel dysfunction. A randomized human trial demonstrated that in utero surgical repair of the MMC defect improves lower limb motor function. However, functional recovery remains incomplete. Stem cell therapy has recently generated great interest in the field of prenatal repair of MMC. In this systematic review we attempt to provide an overview of the current application of stem cells in different animal models of MMC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. This process yielded twenty-two studies for inclusion in this review, experimenting five different types of stem cells: human embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, human amniotic fluid stem cells, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Rodents and ovine were the two major species used for animal model studies. The source, the aims, and the main results were analyzed. Stem cell therapy appears to be a promising candidate for prenatal repair of MMC, especially MSCs. Further explorations in ovine and rodent models, reporting clinical and functional results, are necessary before an application in humans.

Для цитирования: Dugas A, Larghero J, Zérah M, Jouannic J M, Guilbaud L. Cell therapy for prenatal repair of myelomeningocele: A systematic review.. Current research in translational medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2020.04.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.