Psychogenic non-epileptic seizure-status in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizure-status (PNES-status), defined by psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) over 30 min, are often misdiagnosed as status epilepticus. We aimed to describe the features of patients who experienced PNES-status, admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS
We screened the patients hospitalized in our epilepsy unit during a 4-year period, with a diagnosis of PNES-status and ICU admission.
RESULTS
Among 171 patients with PNES, we identified 25 patients (15%) who presented 39 episodes of PNES-status leading to ICU admission. Some 76% of the patients were women. The median age at the time of the PNES-status episode was 35 years. Half (48%) alleged a history of epilepsy, but epilepsy was confirmed in only 12%. A history of psychiatric disease was found in 68%. PNES were present in 85% of patients before PNES-status, and semiology of PNES and PNES-status was similar for 79% of the patients, including hyperkinetic movements in 95% of the episodes and suspected loss of consciousness in 87%. Benzodiazepines were administrated in 77% of the episodes, antiepileptic drugs in 87%, and antibiotherapy for a ICU-related infection in 15% of the episodes. Oral intubation was performed in 41% of the episodes. Blood tests showed normal levels of creatine phosphokinase and leucocytes in 90% and 95% of the episodes, respectively. No epileptic activity was found during per-event electroencephalography but interictal epileptic activity was found in 10% of the episodes.
CONCLUSION
Hyperkinetic PNES-status should always be considered as a differential diagnosis of status epilepticus, with a high risk of iatrogenic consequences.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.