MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jsfa.10339

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2020

No association between dietary acrylamide and renal cell carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.

Jiang Feng, Teng Min, Zhu Yan-Xin, Li Yong-Jie

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The relationship between dietary acrylamide intake and renal cell carcinoma risk is inconclusive. In consideration of the recent findings, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the association between acrylamide intake and renal cell carcinoma risk.

RESULTS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases have been used to identify epidemiological studies on dietary acrylamide intake and renal cell carcinoma risk. This meta-analysis study included eight studies, 2843 cases, and 309 920 controls/participants. We performed meta-analyses to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) for the highest versus lowest intake of dietary acrylamide. No meaningful association was found for renal cell carcinoma; RR was 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-1.28). Among participants who never smoked, no association was found between dietary acrylamide and renal cell carcinoma; the RR for highest versus lowest intake of dietary acrylamide was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.93-1.32).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis study indicates that dietary acrylamide is not related to the risk of renal cell carcinoma. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Для цитирования: Jiang Feng, Teng Min, Zhu Yan-Xin, Li Yong-Jie. No association between dietary acrylamide and renal cell carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.. Journal of the science of food and agriculture. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10339.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.