Source attribution of health benefits from air pollution abatement in Canada and the United States: an adjoint sensitivity analysis.

BACKGROUND

Decision making regarding air pollution can be better informed if air quality impacts are traced back to individual emission sources. Adjoint or backward sensitivity analysis is a modeling tool that can achieve this goal by allowing for quantification of how emissions from sources in different locations influence human health metrics.

OBJECTIVES

We attributed short-term mortality (valuated as an overall "health benefit") in Canada and the United States to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions across North America.

METHODS

We integrated epidemiological data derived from Canadian and U.S. time-series studies with the adjoint of an air quality model and also estimated influences of anthropogenic emissions at each location on nationwide health benefits.

RESULTS

We found significant spatiotemporal variability in estimated health benefit influences of NO(x) and VOC emission reductions on Canada and U.S. mortality. The largest estimated influences on Canada (up to $250,000/day) were from emissions originating in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor, where population centers are concentrated. Estimated influences on the United States tend to be widespread and more substantial owing to both larger emissions and larger populations. The health benefit influences calculated using 24-hr average ozone (O(3)) concentrations are lower in magnitude than estimates calculated using daily 1-hr maximum O(3) concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Source specificity of the adjoint approach provides valuable information for guiding air quality decision making. Adjoint results suggest that the health benefits of reducing NO(x) and VOC emissions are substantial and highly variable across North America.