Correcting CFTR mRNA splicing defects with the plant cytokine kinetin and its analogues.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cystic Fibrosis (CF) results from CFTR gene mutations, including splicing defects such as the polymorphic TGnTm repeat, which disrupts exon-10 inclusion and contributes to CF monosymptomatic forms. While recent advances in CF treatment have led to targeted therapies for specific CFTR defects, most splicing variants remain without an effective treatment. Small molecules, like the plant cytokine kinetin, have shown promise in correcting splicing defects in other genetic diseases, offering potential for personalized CF therapies.
METHODS
This study evaluated the efficacy of kinetin and its analogue, RECTAS, in correcting CFTR exon-10 splicing defects caused by TGnTm repeats. Cell models and patient-derived cells were treated with both compounds to assess their ability to enhance exon-10 inclusion. The impact of these treatments on splicing correction and CFTR protein expression was analyzed using molecular and cellular assays.
RESULTS
Both kinetin and RECTAS improved exon-10 inclusion, with RECTAS demonstrating superior efficacy, achieving up to a four-fold increase in patient-derived cells compared to kinetin. Additionally, RECTAS consistently rescued exon-10 splicing across various TG-T alleles and successfully restored CFTR protein expression, highlighting its potential as a more potent therapeutic option.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings identify RECTAS as an effective modulator of CFTR splicing. Rather than stand-alone therapeutics, kinetin and its analogues may act as transcript amplifiers, thereby possibly enhancing the efficacy of existing CFTR modulators. This approach could broaden treatment options for splicing-related CFTR variants and other genetic disorders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.