Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2011
Effect of a differently tilted angle of mandibular premolar on fracture resistance of 3 postcore restorations.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hou Yongfu, Wu Guotao, Qing Hai, Zhu Zhimin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of differently tilted mandibular premolars on fracture resistance of 3 postcore restorations.
METHODS: Seventy-five extracted human mandibular premolars were simulated to 5 different tilted angles: lingually tilted (LT) 30° and 15°, 0°, and buccally tilted (BT) 15° and 30°, and restored with custom-made metal postcore (CMPC), prefabricated fiber postcore (PFPC), or custom-made fiber postcore (CFPC). Then, a 30° oblique load was applied with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min to the restoration. Failure loads and fracture modes were analyzed (2-way ANOVA and Tukey test, P < .05).
RESULTS: The buccally inclined restoration had higher fracture resistance than that of the lingually tilted restoration. The strength of the PFPC restoration was comparable with that of the CMPC restoration in all tilted groups. As for fracture modes, no significant differences were found among the various tilted restorations.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccally tilted mandibular premolars are more likely to be restored with prefabricated fiber postcore than a lingually inclined mandibular premolar.
METHODS: Seventy-five extracted human mandibular premolars were simulated to 5 different tilted angles: lingually tilted (LT) 30° and 15°, 0°, and buccally tilted (BT) 15° and 30°, and restored with custom-made metal postcore (CMPC), prefabricated fiber postcore (PFPC), or custom-made fiber postcore (CFPC). Then, a 30° oblique load was applied with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min to the restoration. Failure loads and fracture modes were analyzed (2-way ANOVA and Tukey test, P < .05).
RESULTS: The buccally inclined restoration had higher fracture resistance than that of the lingually tilted restoration. The strength of the PFPC restoration was comparable with that of the CMPC restoration in all tilted groups. As for fracture modes, no significant differences were found among the various tilted restorations.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccally tilted mandibular premolars are more likely to be restored with prefabricated fiber postcore than a lingually inclined mandibular premolar.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultBicuspidChromium AlloysComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental Prosthesis DesignDental Restoration FailureDental Stress AnalysisGlassHumansMalocclusionMandibleMaterials TestingPost and Core TechniqueResin CementsRoot Canal PreparationStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesTooth, NonvitalYoung Adult