Ugeskrift for laeger · 2007
[Injuries by colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy requiring laparotomy. Claims to the Patient Insurance Corporation].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adamsen Sven, Mosbach Karin K T, Milliam Palle B, Hansen Ole Hart
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic colonic injury occurs in < 1% and may require surgical intervention. Mortality in Scandinavian studies is 0-0.06% after colonoscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All claims to the Danish Patient Insurance Corporation from 1995-2005 were analysed. Indication, procedure, injury and course were registered.
RESULTS: 111 had injury by colonoscopy and 11 by sigmoidoscopy in 46 departments. 80% were ASA I-II. Indications were symptoms (63%), postoperative follow-up (7%), polyp (27%) or colitis surveillance (3%). 63% had polypectomy. Three had splenic injury and underwent splenectomy. The commonest site of perforation was the sigmoid (61%). The injury was diagnosed immediately in 28%, and after 24 hours (range 8-240) in the remainder. Treatment of perforations included suture with ileostomy (9%) or without ileostomy (29%), resection and anastomosis with enterostomy (12%) or without enterostomy (46%). Five had intraoperative splenic injury. 31% had complications, 15% required reoperation. One suffered a stroke, and one died after 17 days. Hospital stay was 29 days median (3-203). 42% required intensive care for 7 days (1-56). Complications were significantly less frequent in those diagnosed immediately. 37% of those with stoma declined restoration of continuity. During restoration 3/47 had splenic injury. Postoperatively one had anastomotic leak, one had wound dehiscence, and two died.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic colonic injury requiring laparotomy is serious and associated with a high rate of complications. Swift recognition and treatment may reduce the complication rate. Both primary and secondary surgical procedures should be handled by specialists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All claims to the Danish Patient Insurance Corporation from 1995-2005 were analysed. Indication, procedure, injury and course were registered.
RESULTS: 111 had injury by colonoscopy and 11 by sigmoidoscopy in 46 departments. 80% were ASA I-II. Indications were symptoms (63%), postoperative follow-up (7%), polyp (27%) or colitis surveillance (3%). 63% had polypectomy. Three had splenic injury and underwent splenectomy. The commonest site of perforation was the sigmoid (61%). The injury was diagnosed immediately in 28%, and after 24 hours (range 8-240) in the remainder. Treatment of perforations included suture with ileostomy (9%) or without ileostomy (29%), resection and anastomosis with enterostomy (12%) or without enterostomy (46%). Five had intraoperative splenic injury. 31% had complications, 15% required reoperation. One suffered a stroke, and one died after 17 days. Hospital stay was 29 days median (3-203). 42% required intensive care for 7 days (1-56). Complications were significantly less frequent in those diagnosed immediately. 37% of those with stoma declined restoration of continuity. During restoration 3/47 had splenic injury. Postoperatively one had anastomotic leak, one had wound dehiscence, and two died.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic colonic injury requiring laparotomy is serious and associated with a high rate of complications. Swift recognition and treatment may reduce the complication rate. Both primary and secondary surgical procedures should be handled by specialists.