Clinical biochemistry · 2023
Thyroglobulin immunoassay with a fully automated pretreatment process provides accurate thyroglobulin values in anti-thyroglobulin antibody positive specimens.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kitamura Yoshiyuki, Narita Sho, Yagi Shintaro, Aoyagi Katsumi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Human thyroglobulin (Tg) is widely used as a tumor marker for recurrence and metastasis of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Currently, serum Tg values are measured using second-generation sandwich immunoassays (2nd-IMA). However, interference by endogenous autoantibodies to thyroglobulin (TgAbs) can lead to false-negative results or falsely low Tg values. Here, we describe a new Tg assay using the immunoassay for total antigen including complex via pretreatment (iTACT) method to prevent TgAb interference and compare it with 2nd-IMA.
METHODS: Tg values were evaluated by three assays: iTACT Tg, Elecsys Tg-II, which is a 2nd-IMA, and LC-MS/MS (Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry). The ratio of Tg values between each assay was then compared to the Tg value by LC-MS/MS and TgAb titer. Tg immunoreactivity was analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography.
RESULTS: Correlation between iTACT Tg and LC-MS/MS using TgAb-positive specimens was good: Passing-Bablok regression with iTACT Tg = 1.084 × LC-MS/MS + 0.831. Correlation between 2nd-IMA and LC-MS/MS showed a relatively lower slope: 2nd-IMA = 0.747 × LC-MS/MS - 0.518. Thus, Tg values determined by iTACT Tg are equivalent to those of LC-MS/MS regardless of TgAb titer, whereas 2nd-IMA gave lower Tg values due to TgAb interference. Tg-TgAb complexes of various molecular weights were verified by size-exclusion chromatography. Tg values measured by 2nd-IMA fluctuated depending on the molecular weight of the Tg-TgAb complexes, whereas iTACT Tg accurately quantified Tg values regardless of the size of the Tg-TgAb complexes.
CONCLUSION: Tg values in TgAb-positive specimens were accurately determined by iTACT Tg. TgAb-positive specimens contain Tg-TgAb complexes of various molecular weights that interfere with Tg value determination by 2nd-IMA, whereas iTACT Tg is unaffected by the presence of Tg-TgAb complexes.
METHODS: Tg values were evaluated by three assays: iTACT Tg, Elecsys Tg-II, which is a 2nd-IMA, and LC-MS/MS (Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry). The ratio of Tg values between each assay was then compared to the Tg value by LC-MS/MS and TgAb titer. Tg immunoreactivity was analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography.
RESULTS: Correlation between iTACT Tg and LC-MS/MS using TgAb-positive specimens was good: Passing-Bablok regression with iTACT Tg = 1.084 × LC-MS/MS + 0.831. Correlation between 2nd-IMA and LC-MS/MS showed a relatively lower slope: 2nd-IMA = 0.747 × LC-MS/MS - 0.518. Thus, Tg values determined by iTACT Tg are equivalent to those of LC-MS/MS regardless of TgAb titer, whereas 2nd-IMA gave lower Tg values due to TgAb interference. Tg-TgAb complexes of various molecular weights were verified by size-exclusion chromatography. Tg values measured by 2nd-IMA fluctuated depending on the molecular weight of the Tg-TgAb complexes, whereas iTACT Tg accurately quantified Tg values regardless of the size of the Tg-TgAb complexes.
CONCLUSION: Tg values in TgAb-positive specimens were accurately determined by iTACT Tg. TgAb-positive specimens contain Tg-TgAb complexes of various molecular weights that interfere with Tg value determination by 2nd-IMA, whereas iTACT Tg is unaffected by the presence of Tg-TgAb complexes.