Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
Renal Survival in Patients with Collapsing Compared with Not Otherwise Specified FSGS.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laurin Louis-Philippe, Gasim Adil M, Derebail Vimal K, McGregor JulieAnne G, Kidd Jason M, Hogan Susan L, Poulton Caroline J, Detwiler Randal K, Jennette J Charles, Falk Ronald J, Nachman Patrick H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic collapsing FSGS has historically been associated with poor renal outcomes. Minimal clinical data exist on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. Our study sought to provide a comprehensive description of renal survival in patients with collapsing and not otherwise specified FSGS after controlling for factors affecting renal prognosis.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of an inception cohort study of patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2012. All potential patients with collapsing FSGS fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified and compared with patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (approximately 1:2 ratio) on the basis of biopsy report and record availability. Time to ESRD was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were studied (61 collapsing and 126 not otherwise specified), with a mean follow-up of 96 months. At baseline, patients with collapsing FSGS had higher median proteinuria (12.2 [5.6-14.8] versus 4.4 [2.3-8.1] g/d, respectively; P<0.001), lower median albuminemia (2.4 [1.9-3.0] versus 2.9 [1.8-3.7] g/dl, respectively; P=0.12), and lower median eGFR (48 [26-73] versus 60 [42-92] ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P=0.01) than patients with not otherwise specified FSGS. The proportion of patients with remission of proteinuria was similar in patients with collapsing FSGS and patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (65.7% [23 of 35] versus 63.2% [72 of 114], respectively; P=0.84). The overall renal outcome (ESRD defined as eGFR<15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, dialysis, or transplantation) of patients with collapsing FSGS was not poorer than that of patients with not otherwise specified FSGS in multivariate analyses after adjusting for baseline characteristics and immunotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 3.45).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with not otherwise specified FSGS, idiopathic collapsing FSGS presented with more severe nephrotic syndrome and lower eGFR but had a similar renal survival after controlling for exposure to immunosuppressive treatment. These results highlight the importance of early diagnosis and institution of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with collapsing FSGS.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of an inception cohort study of patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2012. All potential patients with collapsing FSGS fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified and compared with patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (approximately 1:2 ratio) on the basis of biopsy report and record availability. Time to ESRD was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were studied (61 collapsing and 126 not otherwise specified), with a mean follow-up of 96 months. At baseline, patients with collapsing FSGS had higher median proteinuria (12.2 [5.6-14.8] versus 4.4 [2.3-8.1] g/d, respectively; P<0.001), lower median albuminemia (2.4 [1.9-3.0] versus 2.9 [1.8-3.7] g/dl, respectively; P=0.12), and lower median eGFR (48 [26-73] versus 60 [42-92] ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; P=0.01) than patients with not otherwise specified FSGS. The proportion of patients with remission of proteinuria was similar in patients with collapsing FSGS and patients with not otherwise specified FSGS (65.7% [23 of 35] versus 63.2% [72 of 114], respectively; P=0.84). The overall renal outcome (ESRD defined as eGFR<15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, dialysis, or transplantation) of patients with collapsing FSGS was not poorer than that of patients with not otherwise specified FSGS in multivariate analyses after adjusting for baseline characteristics and immunotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 3.45).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with not otherwise specified FSGS, idiopathic collapsing FSGS presented with more severe nephrotic syndrome and lower eGFR but had a similar renal survival after controlling for exposure to immunosuppressive treatment. These results highlight the importance of early diagnosis and institution of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with collapsing FSGS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedBiopsyCalcineurin InhibitorsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedProteinuriaRemission InductionRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsYoung Adult