MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2009

[Influence of sperm from different sources on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection].

Song Cheng, Zeng Yong, Hu Xiao-dong, Cheng Jin-quan, Huang Ju, Huang Li-shi, Zhang Wei

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with spermatozoa from different sources.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the rates of fertilization, clinical pregnancy, implantation, abortion, ectopic pregnancy and delivery in 682 patients treated by ICSI, who were divided according to the sperm sources into an ejaculated sperm group (ES, n = 598), a percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA, n = 58) and a testicular sperm extraction (TSE, n = 26).

RESULTS

The fertilization rate was significantly lower in the TSE than in the ES and PESA groups (81.06% vs 87.95% and 87.82%, P < 0.05). But no statistically significant differences were observed among the ES, PESA and TSE groups in the rates of clinical pregnancy (39.46%, 48.28% and 34.62%), implantation (19.80%, 23.80% and 18.34%), abortion (13.13%, 17.86% and 11.11%), ectopic pregnancy (5.51%, 7.14% and 11.11%) and delivery (32.11%, 36.21% and 26.92%) (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although TSE-obtained sperm affect the rate of fertilization, those obtained by TSE and PESA do not obviously influence the outcome of clinical pregnancy.

Для цитирования: Song Cheng, Zeng Yong, Hu Xiao-dong, Cheng Jin-quan, Huang Ju, Huang Li-shi, Zhang Wei. [Influence of sperm from different sources on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection].. Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology. 2009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.