MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.010

Медицинская библиотека · Urologic oncology · 2023

Interruptions in bladder cancer care during the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Gore John L, Follmer Kristin, Reynolds Jason, Nash Michael, Anderson Christopher B, Catto James W F, Chamie Karim, Daneshmand Siamak, Dickstein Rian, Garg Tullika, Gilbert Scott M, Guzzo Thomas J, Kamat Ashish M, Kates Max R, Lane Brian R, Lotan Yair, Mansour Ahmed M, Master Viraj A, Montgomery Jeffrey S, Morris David S, Nepple Kenneth G, O'Neil Brock B, Patel Sanjay, Pohar Kamal, Porten Sima P, Riggs Stephen B, Sankin Alexander, Scarpato Kristen R, Shore Neal D, Steinberg Gary D, Strope Seth A, Taylor Jennifer M, Comstock Bryan A, Kessler Larry G, Wolff Erika M, Smith Angela B

Equivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Academic and community urology centers participating in a pragmatic clinical trial in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer completed monthly surveys assessing restrictions in aspects of bladder cancer care due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Our objective was to describe pandemic-related restrictions on bladder cancer care.

METHODS

We invited 32 sites participating in a multicenter pragmatic bladder cancer trial to complete monthly surveys distributed through REDCap beginning in May 2020. These surveys queried sites on whether they were experiencing restrictions in the use of elective surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), radical cystectomy, office cystoscopy, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) availability. Responses were collated with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 32 eligible sites, 21 sites had at least a 50% monthly response rate over the study period and were included in the analysis. Elective surgery was paused at 76% of sites in May 2020, 48% of sites in January 2021, and 52% of sites in January 2022. Over those same periods, coinciding with COVID-19 incidence waves, TURBT was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 14% of sites, respectively, radical cystectomy was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 19% of sites, respectively, and cystoscopy was restricted at 33%, 0%, and 10% of sites, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder cancer care was minimally restricted compared with more pronounced restrictions seen in general elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Для цитирования: Gore John L, Follmer Kristin, Reynolds Jason, Nash Michael, Anderson Christopher B, Catto James W F, Chamie Karim, Daneshmand Siamak, Dickstein Rian, Garg Tullika, Gilbert Scott M, Guzzo Thomas J, Kamat Ashish M, Kates Max R, Lane Brian R, Lotan Yair, Mansour Ahmed M, Master Viraj A, Montgomery Jeffrey S, Morris David S, Nepple Kenneth G, O'Neil Brock B, Patel Sanjay, Pohar Kamal, Porten Sima P, Riggs Stephen B, Sankin Alexander, Scarpato Kristen R, Shore Neal D, Steinberg Gary D, Strope Seth A, Taylor Jennifer M, Comstock Bryan A, Kessler Larry G, Wolff Erika M, Smith Angela B. Interruptions in bladder cancer care during the COVID-19 public health emergency.. Urologic oncology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.