The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2015
The evaluation of Nesfatin-1 levels in patients with and without intrauterine growth restriction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Serin Salih, Bakacak Murat, Ercan Önder, Köstü Bülent, Avci Fazıl, Arıkan Deniz, Kıran Gürkan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Nesfatin-1 levels in patients with and without intrauterine growth restriction and to analyze the correlation between Nesfatin-1 levels and fetal birth weights.
METHODS: This study comprised a total of 81 cases; 41 patients with IUGR and 40 healthy cases. Demographic data, pregnancy weeks, fetal birth weights and Nesfatin-1 levels were all recorded. The Nesfatin-1 levels were compared between the groups and the correlation between fetal birth weights and Nesfatin-1 levels was analyzed.
RESULTS: No statistical significant difference was determined between the groups in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). Average birth weights were determined as 3420 ± 259 g in the control group and 2041 ± 350 g in the IUGR group, which was found to be statistically unequal (p = 0.001). The average Nesfatin levels in the control group were 0.069 ± 0.011 and 0.094 ± 0.042 in the IUGR group. This difference was statistically unequal (p = 0.001). While no correlation was determined between Nesfatin levels and fetal birthweights in the control group (r = -0.034 versus p = 0.836), in the IUGR group and when all the cases were evaluated together, a statistically moderately significant negative correlation was determined (r = -0.469, p = 0.002 and r = -0.251, p = 0.024, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although intrauterine growth is a multifactorial process, the effect mechanism has not yet been established. The results of this study offer some indications about the possible effect of Nesfatin 1 on fetal growth.
METHODS: This study comprised a total of 81 cases; 41 patients with IUGR and 40 healthy cases. Demographic data, pregnancy weeks, fetal birth weights and Nesfatin-1 levels were all recorded. The Nesfatin-1 levels were compared between the groups and the correlation between fetal birth weights and Nesfatin-1 levels was analyzed.
RESULTS: No statistical significant difference was determined between the groups in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). Average birth weights were determined as 3420 ± 259 g in the control group and 2041 ± 350 g in the IUGR group, which was found to be statistically unequal (p = 0.001). The average Nesfatin levels in the control group were 0.069 ± 0.011 and 0.094 ± 0.042 in the IUGR group. This difference was statistically unequal (p = 0.001). While no correlation was determined between Nesfatin levels and fetal birthweights in the control group (r = -0.034 versus p = 0.836), in the IUGR group and when all the cases were evaluated together, a statistically moderately significant negative correlation was determined (r = -0.469, p = 0.002 and r = -0.251, p = 0.024, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although intrauterine growth is a multifactorial process, the effect mechanism has not yet been established. The results of this study offer some indications about the possible effect of Nesfatin 1 on fetal growth.