MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.842

Медицинская библиотека · Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2012

Comparative evaluation of As, Se and V removal technologies for the treatment of oil refinery wastewater.

Gillenwater P S, Urgun-Demirtas M, Negri M C, Snyder S W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this study, a broad range of readily deployable metal removal technologies were tested on a US refinery's wastewater to determine vanadium, arsenic and selenium removal performance. The bench-scale treatability studies were designed and performed so that test conditions could be as uniform as possible given the different mechanisms of action and engineering applications of each technology. The experimental data show that both ferric precipitation and reactive filtration were able to remove As, Se and V more efficiently from the wastewater than other tested technologies. Additionally, granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption was also effective in both V and As removal. Although the thiol-SAMMS adsorbent was developed for mercury removal, it also demonstrated appreciable selenium removal. None of the tested membrane filtration technologies showed any significant metals removal. This was attributed to the dissolved form of the metals as well as the wastewater's fouling characteristics.

Для цитирования: Gillenwater P S, Urgun-Demirtas M, Negri M C, Snyder S W. Comparative evaluation of As, Se and V removal technologies for the treatment of oil refinery wastewater.. Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. 2012. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.842.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.