Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2025
Integrating Genomic Classifiers and Nonsuspicious Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Predictive Modelling for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wagaskar Vinayak G, Maheshwari Ashutosh, Zaytoun Osama, Agarwal Yashaswini, Kolanukuduru Kaushik P, Tillu Neeraja, Choudhary Manish K, Tewari Ash K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate model predicting lymph node involvement(LNI) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy with/without suspicious magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) with/without genomic classifiers (GC).
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent extended pelvic lymphadenectomy(ePLND) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP). ePLND was defined as removal of obturator, internal and external iliac and distal part of common iliac lymph nodes. Based on preoperative work-up, imaging, and GC testing, we stratified patients into three cohorts. Cohort I with suspicious MRI (n = 2172), cohort II with nonsuspicious MRI (n = 1233) and cohort III with GC irrespective of MRI findings (n = 1003). Logistic regression analysis performed to create nomogram for predicting LNI. Receiver operative characteristics (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate net benefit. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.3.3. We also utilized artificial neural network (ANN) for calculating LNI risk by using binary classification model.
RESULTS: Overall 138 (6.4%), 49 (3.9%) and 69 (6.8%) patients had LNI in cohort I,II and III respectively. Multivariable analysis showed prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG), number of positive cores, MRI LNI were significant predictors of LNI in all cohorts; MRI lesion size, MRI T stage (cohort I), MRI prostate volume (cohort II) and biopsy GC (cohort III) were significant. ROC for predicting LNI were 0.92, 0.84 and 0.91 for cohort I,II and III respectively. Using the ANN, we calculated ROC curves were 0.90,0.82 and 0.91 for cohort I, II and III, respectively. DCA showed a clinical benefit for the model detection of LN metastases for each cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed the nomogram that integrate clinical, radiological, histological and genomic parameters to predict lymph node metastases during prostatectomy. This will avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy at cost of missing of few metastases.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients that underwent extended pelvic lymphadenectomy(ePLND) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP). ePLND was defined as removal of obturator, internal and external iliac and distal part of common iliac lymph nodes. Based on preoperative work-up, imaging, and GC testing, we stratified patients into three cohorts. Cohort I with suspicious MRI (n = 2172), cohort II with nonsuspicious MRI (n = 1233) and cohort III with GC irrespective of MRI findings (n = 1003). Logistic regression analysis performed to create nomogram for predicting LNI. Receiver operative characteristics (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate net benefit. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.3.3. We also utilized artificial neural network (ANN) for calculating LNI risk by using binary classification model.
RESULTS: Overall 138 (6.4%), 49 (3.9%) and 69 (6.8%) patients had LNI in cohort I,II and III respectively. Multivariable analysis showed prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG), number of positive cores, MRI LNI were significant predictors of LNI in all cohorts; MRI lesion size, MRI T stage (cohort I), MRI prostate volume (cohort II) and biopsy GC (cohort III) were significant. ROC for predicting LNI were 0.92, 0.84 and 0.91 for cohort I,II and III respectively. Using the ANN, we calculated ROC curves were 0.90,0.82 and 0.91 for cohort I, II and III, respectively. DCA showed a clinical benefit for the model detection of LN metastases for each cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed the nomogram that integrate clinical, radiological, histological and genomic parameters to predict lymph node metastases during prostatectomy. This will avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy at cost of missing of few metastases.