Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2007
Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kos Marcin, Engelke Werner
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to see whether a new technique of a neck dissection applying an ultrasonic activated (harmonic) scalpel would improve patient recovery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized study was undertaken on 40 supraomohyoid neck dissections performed using a harmonic scalpel (20 pts) or electrocoagulation (20 pts). The evaluation included: operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative seroma formation and pattern of wound healing.
RESULTS: The operative time (mean+/-SD) using a harmonic scalpel was significantly shorter (52+/-10 min vs. 86+/-22 min; p<or=0.001) and the blood loss was less (13+/-7 ml vs. 85+/-58 ml; p<or=0.001), neck drainage on the first and second postoperative days were significantly smaller after using the ultrasonic scalpel (30+/-26 ml; 44+/-23 ml vs. 77+/-65 ml; 118+/-66 ml, p<or=0.001). Wound healing complications amounted to only 5% (20% in the control group).
CONCLUSION: The use of the harmonic scalpel during neck dissection led to diminished bleeding, shorter operative time, lesser seroma formation and better wound healing in the postoperative period.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized study was undertaken on 40 supraomohyoid neck dissections performed using a harmonic scalpel (20 pts) or electrocoagulation (20 pts). The evaluation included: operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative seroma formation and pattern of wound healing.
RESULTS: The operative time (mean+/-SD) using a harmonic scalpel was significantly shorter (52+/-10 min vs. 86+/-22 min; p<or=0.001) and the blood loss was less (13+/-7 ml vs. 85+/-58 ml; p<or=0.001), neck drainage on the first and second postoperative days were significantly smaller after using the ultrasonic scalpel (30+/-26 ml; 44+/-23 ml vs. 77+/-65 ml; 118+/-66 ml, p<or=0.001). Wound healing complications amounted to only 5% (20% in the control group).
CONCLUSION: The use of the harmonic scalpel during neck dissection led to diminished bleeding, shorter operative time, lesser seroma formation and better wound healing in the postoperative period.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AbscessBlood Loss, SurgicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellDrainageEdemaElectrocoagulationFemaleHematomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeck DissectionNeck MusclesPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSeromaSurgical Wound DehiscenceSurgical Wound InfectionTime FactorsUltrasonic TherapyWound Healing