MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1711818

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2017

Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.

Mazer C David, Whitlock Richard P, Fergusson Dean A, Hall Judith, Belley-Cote Emilie, Connolly Katherine, Khanykin Boris, Gregory Alexander J, de Médicis Étienne, McGuinness Shay, Royse Alistair, Carrier François M, Young Paul J, Villar Juan C, Grocott Hilary P, Seeberger Manfred D, Fremes Stephen, Lellouche François, Syed Summer, Byrne Kelly, Bagshaw Sean M, Hwang Nian C, Mehta Chirag, Painter Thomas W, Royse Colin, Verma Subodh, Hare Gregory M T, Cohen Ashley, Thorpe Kevin E, Jüni Peter, Shehata Nadine, TRICS Investigators and Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group

Equivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).

Для цитирования: Mazer C David, Whitlock Richard P, Fergusson Dean A, Hall Judith, Belley-Cote Emilie, Connolly Katherine, Khanykin Boris, Gregory Alexander J, de Médicis Étienne, McGuinness Shay, Royse Alistair, Carrier François M, Young Paul J, Villar Juan C, Grocott Hilary P, Seeberger Manfred D, Fremes Stephen, Lellouche François, Syed Summer, Byrne Kelly, Bagshaw Sean M, Hwang Nian C, Mehta Chirag, Painter Thomas W, Royse Colin, Verma Subodh, Hare Gregory M T, Cohen Ashley, Thorpe Kevin E, Jüni Peter, Shehata Nadine, TRICS Investigators and Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.. The New England journal of medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1711818.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.