Pharmaceutical research · 2026
Computational Design of a Trivalent Multi-Epitope mRNA Vaccine Candidate Against Western, Eastern, and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Viruses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qin Rongliu, Luo Yuying, Zhou Ziyou, Xu Yizhong, Wu Xu, Hou Yanqun, Chen Jie, Zhu Fei, Pan Pinhua
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV), Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV), and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) are mosquito-borne neurotropic alphaviruses that can cause severe encephalitis in humans and equids, yet no licensed vaccines are currently available for routine human prevention. This study aimed to computationally design a trivalent multi-epitope mRNA vaccine targeting WEEV, EEEV, and VEEV.
METHODS: Immunoinformatics and reverse vaccinology approaches were used to identify conserved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, helper T-lymphocyte, and linear B-cell epitopes from the three viruses. Fifteen candidate constructs incorporating different immunomodulatory strategies were evaluated for predicted antigenicity, safety, stability, and solubility, and the construct with the most balanced overall profile was selected for further analysis. Secondary- and tertiary-structure prediction, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, binding free-energy analysis, and immune simulation were subsequently performed.
RESULTS: WEV showed a favorable overall physicochemical and immunological profile, supporting its further structural and immunological characterization. Molecular docking demonstrated favorable interactions between WEV and TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4, with the strongest predicted HADDOCK score observed for TLR4. In contrast, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA analysis indicated greater dynamic stability and a more favorable estimated binding free energy for the WEV-TLR2 complex. In silico immune simulation predicted enhanced IgM and IgG production, B- and T-cell responses, memory-cell formation, and increased IFN-γ and IL-2 levels.
CONCLUSIONS: WEV represents a computationally designed trivalent multi-epitope mRNA vaccine candidate against WEEV, EEEV, and VEEV. The present study provides a sequence-defined framework for the rational development of multivalent vaccines, and further in vitro and in vivo studies are warranted to evaluate antigen expression, immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and safety.
METHODS: Immunoinformatics and reverse vaccinology approaches were used to identify conserved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, helper T-lymphocyte, and linear B-cell epitopes from the three viruses. Fifteen candidate constructs incorporating different immunomodulatory strategies were evaluated for predicted antigenicity, safety, stability, and solubility, and the construct with the most balanced overall profile was selected for further analysis. Secondary- and tertiary-structure prediction, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, binding free-energy analysis, and immune simulation were subsequently performed.
RESULTS: WEV showed a favorable overall physicochemical and immunological profile, supporting its further structural and immunological characterization. Molecular docking demonstrated favorable interactions between WEV and TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4, with the strongest predicted HADDOCK score observed for TLR4. In contrast, molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA analysis indicated greater dynamic stability and a more favorable estimated binding free energy for the WEV-TLR2 complex. In silico immune simulation predicted enhanced IgM and IgG production, B- and T-cell responses, memory-cell formation, and increased IFN-γ and IL-2 levels.
CONCLUSIONS: WEV represents a computationally designed trivalent multi-epitope mRNA vaccine candidate against WEEV, EEEV, and VEEV. The present study provides a sequence-defined framework for the rational development of multivalent vaccines, and further in vitro and in vivo studies are warranted to evaluate antigen expression, immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and safety.