Transplantation · 2006
An open prospective pilot study on the use of rapamycin after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Birnbaum Florian, Reis Alexander, Böhringer Daniel, Sokolowska Yevgenia, Mayer Klaus, Voiculescu Adina, Oellerich Michael, Sundmacher Rainer, Reinhard Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to prove efficacy and safety of systemic immunosuppression with rapamycin following penetrating high-risk keratoplasty. Rapamycin has shown its immunosuppressive potential in the rat keratoplasty model and is a component of several immunosuppressive protocols after solid organ transplantation. In this pilot study, we compared the efficacy and safety of rapamycin and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
METHODS: Ten patients (group 1) undergoing high-risk keratoplasty were included in this study, receiving rapamycin as postoperative immunoprophylaxis. Rapamycin was administered orally once daily (blood trough level 4-10 ng/ml) for 6 months. Thereafter, it was tapered over 2 weeks. The control group (group 2) consisted of 24 patients who received 1000 mg MMF twice daily for 6 months. All of the patients received postoperative medication with fluocortolone 1 mg/kg/day (tapered over 3 weeks) and prednisolone acetate eyedrops 5 times per day (tapered over 5 months).
RESULTS: Mean follow-up of all patients (n=34) was 739 days. No immune reaction was observed in groups 1 and 2 during the first 6 months under immunosuppression. Two immune reactions occurred in group 1, and five in group 2 within a 2-year follow-up. All of the immune reactions were reversible. The side effects observed in both groups were mostly reversible.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin and mycophenolate mofetil seem to be similarly efficacious in preventing immune reactions after high-risk keratoplasty, as long as they are administered. However, we observed a broad spectrum of side effects from rapamycin.
METHODS: Ten patients (group 1) undergoing high-risk keratoplasty were included in this study, receiving rapamycin as postoperative immunoprophylaxis. Rapamycin was administered orally once daily (blood trough level 4-10 ng/ml) for 6 months. Thereafter, it was tapered over 2 weeks. The control group (group 2) consisted of 24 patients who received 1000 mg MMF twice daily for 6 months. All of the patients received postoperative medication with fluocortolone 1 mg/kg/day (tapered over 3 weeks) and prednisolone acetate eyedrops 5 times per day (tapered over 5 months).
RESULTS: Mean follow-up of all patients (n=34) was 739 days. No immune reaction was observed in groups 1 and 2 during the first 6 months under immunosuppression. Two immune reactions occurred in group 1, and five in group 2 within a 2-year follow-up. All of the immune reactions were reversible. The side effects observed in both groups were mostly reversible.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin and mycophenolate mofetil seem to be similarly efficacious in preventing immune reactions after high-risk keratoplasty, as long as they are administered. However, we observed a broad spectrum of side effects from rapamycin.