[Evaluation of methods for studying susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates].

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus associated with a variety of clinical infections. In this paper we present the results of a comparative study using 4 methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 S. lugdunensis isolates.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We studied 60 S. lugdunensis isolates obtained from clinical specimens sent to our laboratory over an 8-year period. All isolates were free coagulase-negative and DNase-negative, and biochemically identified by API ID 32 STAPH (bioMérieux). Presence of mecA and ss-lactamase production were studied in all cases. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Vitek 2 System (bioMérieux) and broth microdilution (Wider) (Soria Melguizo) for penicillin and oxacillin, and the E-test (AB Biodisk) and cefoxitin disk diffusion test (BD BBLTM) for oxacillin.

RESULTS

All isolates lacked the mecA gene and were susceptible to oxacillin by broth microdilution, E-test, and cefoxitin disk diffusion test. Only two isolates were oxacillin-resistant by the Vitek 2 System. Twenty-four isolates (40%) were ss-lactamase-positive, 4 after induction. Susceptibility testing to penicillin determined that 48 isolates showed concordance between the results obtained by broth microdilution and Vitek 2, but 12 isolates (20%), showed divergent results.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected no resistance to oxacillin in S. lugdunensis. All the methods evaluated were adequate for determining oxacillin resistance. The Vitek 2 System is useful for detecting penicillin resistance, but the ss-lactamase test should be applied to isolates with a MIC=0.25microg/ml to avoid the interpretation of false resistance to this antibiotic.