MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa043204

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2006

A randomized trial of inhaled cyclosporine in lung-transplant recipients.

Iacono Aldo T, Johnson Bruce A, Grgurich Wayne F, Youssef J Georges, Corcoran Timothy E, Seiler Deidre A, Dauber James H, Smaldone Gerald C, Zeevi Adriana, Yousem Samuel A, Fung John J, Burckart Gilbert J, McCurry Kenneth R, Griffith Bartley P

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Conventional regimens of immunosuppressive drugs often do not prevent chronic rejection after lung transplantation. Topical delivery of cyclosporine in addition to conventional systemic immunosuppression might help prevent acute and chronic rejection events.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of inhaled cyclosporine initiated within six weeks after transplantation and given in addition to systemic immunosuppression. A total of 58 patients were randomly assigned to inhale either 300 mg of aerosol cyclosporine (28 patients) or aerosol placebo (30 patients) three days a week for the first two years after transplantation. The primary end point was the rate of histologic acute rejection.

RESULTS

The rates of acute rejection of grade 2 or higher were similar in the cyclosporine and placebo groups: 0.44 episode (95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.62) vs. 0.46 episode (95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.64) per patient per year, respectively (P=0.87 by Poisson regression). Survival was improved with aerosolized cyclosporine, with 3 deaths among patients receiving cyclosporine and 14 deaths among patients receiving placebo (relative risk of death, 0.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.70; P=0.01). Chronic rejection-free survival also improved with cyclosporine, as determined by spirometric analysis (10 events in the cyclosporine group and 20 events in the placebo group; relative risk of chronic rejection, 0.38; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.82; P=0.01) and histologic analysis (6 vs. 19 events, respectively; relative risk, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.67; P=0.005). The risks of nephrotoxic effects and opportunistic infection were similar for patients in the cyclosporine group and the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled cyclosporine did not improve the rate of acute rejection, but it did improve survival and extend periods of chronic rejection-free survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00268515.).

Для цитирования: Iacono Aldo T, Johnson Bruce A, Grgurich Wayne F, Youssef J Georges, Corcoran Timothy E, Seiler Deidre A, Dauber James H, Smaldone Gerald C, Zeevi Adriana, Yousem Samuel A, Fung John J, Burckart Gilbert J, McCurry Kenneth R, Griffith Bartley P. A randomized trial of inhaled cyclosporine in lung-transplant recipients.. The New England journal of medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa043204.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.