MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.968

Медицинская библиотека · Fertility and sterility · 2009

Aberrant implantation and growth of uterine leiomyoma in the abdominal wall after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy.

Wada-Hiraike Osamu, Yamamoto Naoko, Osuga Yutaka, Yano Tetsu, Kozuma Shiro, Taketani Yuji

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of aberrant implantation and growth of uterine leiomyoma in the abdominal wall after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S): One 27-year-old woman with a newly developed solid mass in the abdominal wall near the minilaparotomic site of a previous laparoscopically assisted myomectomy.

INTERVENTION(S): Surgical removal of the mass.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Histologic examination of the mass.

RESULT(S): A newly developed mass measuring approximately 9 cm was surgically removed. The mass was located in the fascial area of abdomen close to the incision site of a previous laparoscopically assisted myomectomy. Histologic diagnosis including Hematoxylin-Eosin staining and immunohistochemistry confirmed that the lesion was compatible with uterine leiomyoma.

CONCLUSION(S): Implantation and growth of uterine leiomyoma fragments after myomectomy is a rare event. However, this complication should be considered as a differential diagnosis when a progressively growing mass is observed at the incision site.

Для цитирования: Wada-Hiraike Osamu, Yamamoto Naoko, Osuga Yutaka, Yano Tetsu, Kozuma Shiro, Taketani Yuji. Aberrant implantation and growth of uterine leiomyoma in the abdominal wall after laparoscopically assisted myomectomy.. Fertility and sterility. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.968.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.