DOI 10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.010
Clinical benefits of natriuretic peptides and galectin-3 are maintained in old dyspnoeic patients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Acute dyspnoea is the leading cause of unscheduled admission of elderly patients. Several biomarkers are used to diagnose acute heart failure (AHF) and assess prognosis of dyspnoeic patients, but their value in elderly patients is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To compare diagnostic and prognostic performances of conventional and novel cardiovascular biomarkers in 2 age groups: young (<75 years old) vs. old (≥75 years old) dyspnoeic patients.
DESIGN
Prospective observational registry.
SETTING
Emergency department (ED).
SUBJECTS: Acutely dyspnoeic adult patients.
METHODS
Blood samples were collected at ED admission. The diagnostic value of 4 natriuretic peptides (BNP, proBNP, NT-proBNP, MR-proANP) for AHF was tested. We also assessed the prognostic value of same natriuretic peptides and of 3 novel cardiovascular biomarkers (galectin-3, sST2 and proenkephalin), using 1-year all-cause mortality as end-point. Diagnostic or prognostic performances are expressed as area under the receiveroperating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
Two hundred one acutely dyspnoeic patients were studied. AHF was the cause of dyspnoea in 57% of old and 44% of young patients, respectively. All 4 natriuretic peptides performed well in diagnosing AHF in both age groups (all AUC>0.7). BNP showed the best diagnostic performance in both old (AUC: 0.98 [0.97-1.00]) and young (AUC 0.98 [0.95-1.00]) patients. Galectin-3 showed the best prognostic performance in both old (AUC 0.74 [0.62-0.87]) and young patients (AUC 0.75 [0.56-0.94]).
CONCLUSIONS
BNP and galectin-3 show good clinical benefits in both oldand young acutely dyspnoeic patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.