MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3906/sag-1902-200

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2019

Does different subfertility etiology affect pregnancy rates in intrauterineinsemination cycles?

Turgay Batuhan, Şükür Yavuz Emre, Özmen Batuhan, Aytaç Ruşen, Atabekoğlu Cem Somer, Berber Bülent, Sönmezer Murat

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the relationship between subfertility etiologies and success rates in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination (COS–IUI) cycles.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The medical records of 218 couples who applied to a university-based fertility center were analyzed retrospectively. Detailed infertility examination data and pregnancy outcomes were compared according to different subfertility etiologies. The study groups with regard to subfertility etiologies were minimal–mild endometriosis, unexplained infertility, and mild male infertility. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding demographics except for total motile sperm count. Live birth rates in the male infertility group were comparable to the endometriosis and unexpected infertility groups (6.6%, 11.9%, and 10.3%, respectively; P = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of the mild male subfertility group following COS–IUI cycles for live birth rates was similar to those of the endometriosis and unexplained subfertility groups.

Для цитирования: Turgay Batuhan, Şükür Yavuz Emre, Özmen Batuhan, Aytaç Ruşen, Atabekoğlu Cem Somer, Berber Bülent, Sönmezer Murat. Does different subfertility etiology affect pregnancy rates in intrauterineinsemination cycles?. Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2019. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1902-200.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.