MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The heart surgery forum · 2004

Robotic Surgery, the First 100 Cases: Where Do We Go from Here?

Menkis Alan H., Kodera Kojiro, Kiaii Bob, Swinamer Stuart A., Rayman Reiza, Boyd W. Douglas

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Abstract

Background

Since the robot-assisted cardiac surgery program at this center was initiated in September 1998 the results have been regularly critically evaluated. We report a retrospective review of the first 100 robotic procedures and their evolution.

Methods

Between September 1998 and May 2001, 146 patients underwent robot-assisted procedures. All procedures were performed using the Aesop robotically controlled camera or the Zeus robotic system. A harmonic scalpel was used for all internal thoracic artery (ITA) dissections whether the dissections were performed manually or with the Zeus robotic system.

Results

There were 123 closed-heart and 23 open-heart procedures, which included 8 atrial-septal defect repairs, 11 mitral valve repairs, 4 mitral valve replacements, 57 Aesop ITA takedowns, 68 Zeus ITA takedowns, and 13 totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafts. Graft patency in Aesop and Zeus ITA takedown groups was 96%. All the patients were New York Heart Association class I after their procedures.

Conclusion

With the development of surgical robots, it has been possible to perform endoscopic cardiac surgery for selected cases. Future directions will be demonstrated, including telementoring, telesurgery, and Zeus-assisted initiatives in cardiac surgery and other surgical disciplines.

Для цитирования: Menkis Alan H., Kodera Kojiro, Kiaii Bob, Swinamer Stuart A., Rayman Reiza, Boyd W. Douglas. Robotic Surgery, the First 100 Cases: Where Do We Go from Here?. The heart surgery forum. 2004.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.