MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005424

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2022

Outcome of Temporary Circulatory Support As a Bridge-to-Left Ventricular Assist Device Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

Bidaut Auriane, Flécher Erwan, Nesseler Nicolas, Bounader Karl, Vincentelli André, Moussa Mouhammed, Delmas Clément, Porterie Jean, Nubret Karine, Pernot Mathieu, Kindo Michel, Schneider Clément, Gaudard Philippe, Rouvière Philippe, Michel Magali, Sénage Thomas, Boignard Aude, Chavanon Olivier, Verdonk Constance, Para Marylou, Maille Baptiste, Gariboldi Vlad, Pozzi Matteo, Hugon-Vallet Elisabeth, Litzler Pierre-Yves, Anselme Frédéric, Blanchart Katrien, Babatasi Gerard, Bielefeld Marie, Grosjean Sandrine, Radu Costin, Hamon David, Bourguignon Thierry, Genet Thibaud, Eschalier Romain, D'Ostrevy Nicolas, Nougue Hélène, Martin Anne Cécile, Vanhuyse Fabrice, Blangy Hugues, Leclercq Christophe, Martins Raphael P, Galand Vincent

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Temporary circulatory support (TCS) as a bridge-to-left ventricular assist device (BTL) in cardiogenic shock patients has been increasing, but limited data exists on this BTL strategy. We aimed at analyzing the outcome of BTL patients in a population of cardiogenic shock patients compared with those without TCS at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and identify predictors of postoperative mortality in this specific population.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective observational study conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016.

SETTING

Nineteen French centers.

PATIENTS: A total of 329 cardiogenic shock patients at the time of LVAD implantation were analyzed. Patients were divided in three groups: those under TCS at the time of LVAD implantation (n = 173), those with TCS removal before LVAD surgery (n = 24), and those who did not undergo a bridging strategy (n = 152). Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Among the BTL group, 68 (39.3%), 18 (10.4%), and 15 (8.7%) patients were under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and IABP support alone, and 72 patients (20.6%) were under multiple TCS support. BTL patients presented similar 30 days survival compared with the TCS removal and non-BTL groups. However, BTL group had a significantly longer ICU duration stay, with two-fold duration of mechanical ventilation time, but the three groups experienced similar postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of mortality in the BTL group: combined surgery with LVAD, body mass index (BMI), and heart failure (HF) duration. BTL strategy was not an independent predictor of mortality in cardiogenic shock patients who underwent LVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

BTL strategy is not associated with a lower survival among cardiogenic shock patients with LVAD implantation. Predictors of mortality are combined surgery with LVAD, higher BMI, and HF duration.

Для цитирования: Bidaut Auriane, Flécher Erwan, Nesseler Nicolas, Bounader Karl, Vincentelli André, Moussa Mouhammed, Delmas Clément, Porterie Jean, Nubret Karine, Pernot Mathieu, Kindo Michel, Schneider Clément, Gaudard Philippe, Rouvière Philippe, Michel Magali, Sénage Thomas, Boignard Aude, Chavanon Olivier, Verdonk Constance, Para Marylou, Maille Baptiste, Gariboldi Vlad, Pozzi Matteo, Hugon-Vallet Elisabeth, Litzler Pierre-Yves, Anselme Frédéric, Blanchart Katrien, Babatasi Gerard, Bielefeld Marie, Grosjean Sandrine, Radu Costin, Hamon David, Bourguignon Thierry, Genet Thibaud, Eschalier Romain, D'Ostrevy Nicolas, Nougue Hélène, Martin Anne Cécile, Vanhuyse Fabrice, Blangy Hugues, Leclercq Christophe, Martins Raphael P, Galand Vincent. Outcome of Temporary Circulatory Support As a Bridge-to-Left Ventricular Assist Device Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.. Critical care medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005424.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.