MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1597/13-347

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2014

Prevalence of cleft lip and cleft palate in rural north-central guatemala.

Matute Jorge, Lydick Elaine A, Torres Olga R, Owen Karen K, Jacobsen Kathryn H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the number of new cases of cleft lip and cleft palate in the department (state) of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala, in 2012.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of midwives from communities identified through a two-stage cluster-sampling process. Midwives were asked how many babies they had delivered in the past year and how many of those newborns had various types of birth defects, as illustrated in pictures.

SETTING

Indigenous Mayan communities in rural north-central Guatemala.

PARTICIPANTS

Midwives (n = 129) who had delivered babies in the previous year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reports of babies born with cleft lip and cleft palate.

RESULTS

A 1-year prevalence rate of 18.9 per 10,000 for cleft lip and 4.7 per 10,000 for cleft palate was estimated for Alta Verapaz. None of the cases of cleft lip also had cleft palate.

CONCLUSION

The indigenous communities in north-central Guatemala might have a relatively high cleft lip prevalence rate compared with the global average.

Для цитирования: Matute Jorge, Lydick Elaine A, Torres Olga R, Owen Karen K, Jacobsen Kathryn H. Prevalence of cleft lip and cleft palate in rural north-central guatemala.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2014. DOI: 10.1597/13-347.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.