MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00048670701264636

Медицинская библиотека · The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2007

CAOS contribution to understanding cultural/ethnic differences in the prevalence of bipolar affective disorder in New Zealand.

Mellsop Graham, Dutu Gaelle, El-Badri Selim

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether data on the clinical profiles of psychiatric service users can inform the claim that Māori in the New Zealand community have an increased rate of bipolar disorder.

METHOD: The standardized recordings of a variety of clinical phenomena previously collected in a New Zealand study of psychiatric service users was extracted for those persons who were diagnosed with a bipolar mental disorder. The individual clinical phenomena were then compared by ethnicity.

RESULTS

The most dramatic result was the increased recording of high levels of overactivity or disruptive aggressive behaviour in Māori compared with European in psychiatric service users, despite which, the rates of the disorder did not significantly differ by ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

In the community survey lay raters were deciding on the presence or absence of phenomena including hyperactivity without the contextual knowledge that clinicians use. It is possible that the Composite International Diagnostic Interview decision tree was being fed an excessive amount of that criterion.

Для цитирования: Mellsop Graham, Dutu Gaelle, El-Badri Selim. CAOS contribution to understanding cultural/ethnic differences in the prevalence of bipolar affective disorder in New Zealand.. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 2007. DOI: 10.1080/00048670701264636.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.