Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2023
Association of cumulative social risk and gestational diabetes mellitus in the US, 2007-2018.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sadiq Rabail, Bukhari Muhammad H, Brown Todd T, Bennett Wendy L, Retnakaran Ravi, Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B
Аннотация
AIMS: Little is known regarding the association of multiple social risk factors and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
METHODS: We analyzed the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys including 10,439 women aged ≥20 years (8 % with history of GDM). We created a cumulative social risk score (CSR) by adding scores assigned to each of the following: race/ethnicity, citizenship status and country of birth, education, and family income (score of 0 used as reference group). Using logistic regression, we assessed the associations of individual social risk factors (education, income, race/ethnicity and citizenship status) and CSR score with GDM, adjusting for age, parity, insurance status, care access, smoking, diet, physical activity, and body mass index.
RESULTS: Among individual social risk factors, being a non-U.S. citizen (OR:1.51, 95% CI: 1.06-2.15) or belonging to a minority racial/ethnic group (OR:1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.59) was significantly associated with a greater odds of GDM. When examining the combined effects of social risk factors, a CSR score ≥3 was associated with an increased odds of GDM (OR:1.64, 95% CI: 1.22-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a greater burden of social risk factors are more likely to have GDM, thus should be the focus of interventions to prevent and treat GDM.
METHODS: We analyzed the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys including 10,439 women aged ≥20 years (8 % with history of GDM). We created a cumulative social risk score (CSR) by adding scores assigned to each of the following: race/ethnicity, citizenship status and country of birth, education, and family income (score of 0 used as reference group). Using logistic regression, we assessed the associations of individual social risk factors (education, income, race/ethnicity and citizenship status) and CSR score with GDM, adjusting for age, parity, insurance status, care access, smoking, diet, physical activity, and body mass index.
RESULTS: Among individual social risk factors, being a non-U.S. citizen (OR:1.51, 95% CI: 1.06-2.15) or belonging to a minority racial/ethnic group (OR:1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.59) was significantly associated with a greater odds of GDM. When examining the combined effects of social risk factors, a CSR score ≥3 was associated with an increased odds of GDM (OR:1.64, 95% CI: 1.22-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a greater burden of social risk factors are more likely to have GDM, thus should be the focus of interventions to prevent and treat GDM.