MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s40792-022-01525-3

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical case reports · 2022

The safe removal of a superior mediastinal foreign body by mediastinoscopy: a case report.

Sakuma Takashi, Tamura Tatsuro, Nambara Mikio, Gyobu Ken, Yoshii Mami, Toyokawa Takahiro, Lee Shigeru, Tanaka Hiroaki, Muguruma Kazuya, Yashiro Masakazu, Ohira Masaichi, Maeda Kiyoshi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Mediastinal foreign bodies might cause mediastinal organ injury or mediastinal abscess. The prompt removal surgery of mediastinal foreign bodies is needed to prevent those complications. We report a case in which a mediastinal foreign body was removed by video-mediastinoscopy.

CASE PRESENTATION: The patient, a 74-year-old man with a chief complaint of hoarseness, was referred to our department for surgical management of a wooden foreign body that had traumatically migrated into the superior mediastinum. During the surgery, the video-mediastinoscopy was introduced under the pneumomediastinal pressure. We could dissect the scar tissue and remove the azalea tree branch safely and carefully, without damaging the other mediastinal organs. He was discharged on postoperative day 5, with no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-mediastinoscopic approach under pneumomediastinal pressure is minimally invasive and could provide wide surgical view. Therefore, we consider it useful and effective for removal of foreign bodies in the mediastinum.

Для цитирования: Sakuma Takashi, Tamura Tatsuro, Nambara Mikio, Gyobu Ken, Yoshii Mami, Toyokawa Takahiro, Lee Shigeru, Tanaka Hiroaki, Muguruma Kazuya, Yashiro Masakazu, Ohira Masaichi, Maeda Kiyoshi. The safe removal of a superior mediastinal foreign body by mediastinoscopy: a case report.. Surgical case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01525-3.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.